BMW XM Label vs Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
BMW XM Label
3.8 s
Runner-up: 6.5 s
Power winner
BMW XM Label
748 hp
Runner-up: 340 hp
Cargo winner
BMW XM Label
527 L
Runner-up: 400 L
Price winner
Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
$48,000
Runner-up: $185,000
Key differences
- BMW XM Label is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.8 s vs 6.5 s).
- BMW XM Label has more power (748 hp vs 340 hp).
- BMW XM Label has more cargo volume (527 L vs 400 L).
- Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has the lower starting MSRP ($48,000 vs $185,000).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8 s | 6.5 s |
| Top Speed | 290 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power | 748 hp | 340 hp |
| Torque | 1,000 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 77 km | — |
| Battery | 25.7 kWh | — |
| Fuel Tank | 69 L | 68 L |
| Efficiency | 1.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 40 g/km | 224 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 5,110 mm | 5,099 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 183 mm | 201 mm |
| Cargo | 527 L | 400 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,785 kg | 2,100 kg |
| Towing | 2,700 kg | 2,268 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 8 |
| Turning Circle | 12.6 m | 12.0 m |
| Starting MSRP | $185,000 | $48,000 |
