Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD vs Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
3.6 s
Runner-up: 5.5 s
Range winner
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD
480 km
Runner-up: 438 km
Power winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
428 hp
Runner-up: 340 hp
Cargo winner
Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD
769 L
Runner-up: 318 L
Price winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
$41,200
Runner-up: $43,900
Key differences
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.6 s vs 5.5 s).
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more range (480 km vs 438 km).
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance has more power (428 hp vs 340 hp).
- Chevrolet Equinox EV 3LT AWD has more cargo volume (769 L vs 318 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5 s | 3.6 s |
| Top Speed | 190 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power | 340 hp | 428 hp |
| Torque | 580 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 480 km | 438 km |
| Battery | 85 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Efficiency | 17.7 kWh/100km | 15.7 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 150 kW | 153 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,837 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 175 mm |
| Cargo | 769 L | 318 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,200 kg | 1,900 kg |
| Towing | 680 kg | 1,000 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.2 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $43,900 | $41,200 |
