Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium vs Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI 95 Style
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
9.8 s
Runner-up: 11.3 s
Power winner
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
125 hp
Runner-up: 95 hp
Cargo winner
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium
456 L
Runner-up: 400 L
Price winner
Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI 95 Style
$23,500
Runner-up: $27,500
Key differences
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium is quicker from 0-100 km/h (9.8 s vs 11.3 s).
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has more power (125 hp vs 95 hp).
- Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid Titanium has more cargo volume (456 L vs 400 L).
- Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI 95 Style has the lower starting MSRP ($23,500 vs $27,500).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 9.8 s | 11.3 s |
| Top Speed | 192 km/h | 187 km/h |
| Power | 125 hp | 95 hp |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Fuel Tank | 42 L | 50 L |
| Efficiency | 5.6 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 127 g/km | 123 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,207 mm | 4,241 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 148 mm | 175 mm |
| Cargo | 456 L | 400 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,270 kg | 1,230 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 10.6 m | 10.4 m |
| Starting MSRP | $27,500 | $23,500 |
