Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e vs Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e
5.4 s
Runner-up: 6.5 s
Power winner
Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e
510 hp
Runner-up: 340 hp
Cargo winner
Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e
647 L
Runner-up: 400 L
Price winner
Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium
$48,000
Runner-up: $106,200
Key differences
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e is quicker from 0-100 km/h (5.4 s vs 6.5 s).
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has more power (510 hp vs 340 hp).
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has more cargo volume (647 L vs 400 L).
- Mazda CX-90 3.3 Turbo Premium has the lower starting MSRP ($48,000 vs $106,200).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.5 s |
| Top Speed | 242 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power | 510 hp | 340 hp |
| Torque | 750 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 113 km | — |
| Battery | 38.2 kWh | — |
| Fuel Tank | 65 L | 68 L |
| Efficiency | 2.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 62 g/km | 224 g/km |
| DC Charging | 50 kW | — |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,946 mm | 5,099 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 213 mm | 201 mm |
| Cargo | 647 L | 400 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,640 kg | 2,100 kg |
| Towing | 3,000 kg | 2,268 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 8 |
| Turning Circle | 12.4 m | 12.0 m |
| Starting MSRP | $106,200 | $48,000 |
