Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e vs Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
3.6 s
Runner-up: 5.4 s
Range winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
438 km
Runner-up: 113 km
Power winner
Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e
510 hp
Runner-up: 428 hp
Cargo winner
Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e
647 L
Runner-up: 318 L
Price winner
Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance
$41,200
Runner-up: $106,200
Key differences
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.6 s vs 5.4 s).
- Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance has more range (438 km vs 113 km).
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has more power (510 hp vs 428 hp).
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport P510e has more cargo volume (647 L vs 318 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4 s | 3.6 s |
| Top Speed | 242 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power | 510 hp | 428 hp |
| Torque | 750 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 113 km | 438 km |
| Battery | 38.2 kWh | 69 kWh |
| Fuel Tank | 65 L | — |
| Efficiency | 2.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 62 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 50 kW | 153 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,946 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 213 mm | 175 mm |
| Cargo | 647 L | 318 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,640 kg | 1,900 kg |
| Towing | 3,000 kg | 1,000 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.4 m | 10.6 m |
| Starting MSRP | $106,200 | $41,200 |
