NIO ET7 100 kWh vs Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
NIO ET7 100 kWh
3.8 s
Runner-up: 4.3 s
Range winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
592 km
Runner-up: 585 km
Power winner
NIO ET7 100 kWh
653 hp
Runner-up: 421 hp
Cargo winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
405 L
Runner-up: 386 L
Price winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
$53,900
Runner-up: $69,900
Key differences
- NIO ET7 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.3 s).
- Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor has more range (592 km vs 585 km).
- NIO ET7 100 kWh has more power (653 hp vs 421 hp).
- Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor has more cargo volume (405 L vs 386 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8 s | 4.3 s |
| Top Speed | 200 km/h | 205 km/h |
| Power | 653 hp | 421 hp |
| Torque | 850 Nm | 740 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 585 km | 592 km |
| Battery | 100 kWh | 82 kWh |
| Efficiency | 17.1 kWh/100km | 16 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 140 kW | 205 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 5,101 mm | 4,606 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 152 mm | 151 mm |
| Cargo | 386 L | 405 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,280 kg | 2,113 kg |
| Towing | — | 1,500 kg |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 12.3 m | 11.5 m |
| Starting MSRP | $69,900 | $53,900 |
