Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor vs NIO ET7 100 kWh
Comparison winners
5 metrics
0-100 winner
NIO ET7 100 kWh
3.8 s
Runner-up: 4.3 s
Range winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
592 km
Runner-up: 585 km
Power winner
NIO ET7 100 kWh
653 hp
Runner-up: 421 hp
Cargo winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
405 L
Runner-up: 386 L
Price winner
Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor
$53,900
Runner-up: $69,900
Key differences
- NIO ET7 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.3 s).
- Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor has more range (592 km vs 585 km).
- NIO ET7 100 kWh has more power (653 hp vs 421 hp).
- Polestar 2 Long Range Dual Motor has more cargo volume (405 L vs 386 L).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.8 s |
| Top Speed | 205 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power | 421 hp | 653 hp |
| Torque | 740 Nm | 850 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Range | 592 km | 585 km |
| Battery | 82 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Efficiency | 16 kWh/100km | 17.1 kWh/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 0 g/km | 0 g/km |
| DC Charging | 205 kW | 140 kW |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,606 mm | 5,101 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 151 mm | 152 mm |
| Cargo | 405 L | 386 L |
| Curb Weight | 2,113 kg | 2,280 kg |
| Towing | 1,500 kg | — |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 11.5 m | 12.3 m |
| Starting MSRP | $53,900 | $69,900 |
