Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4 vs Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
Comparison winners
4 metrics
0-100 winner
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4
6.2 s
Runner-up: 6.6 s
Power winner
Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4
265 hp
Runner-up: 256 hp
Cargo winner
Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
889 L
Runner-up: 340 L
Price winner
Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus
$41,500
Runner-up: $48,500
Key differences
- Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h (6.2 s vs 6.6 s).
- Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TSI RS 4x4 has more power (265 hp vs 256 hp).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has more cargo volume (889 L vs 340 L).
- Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus has the lower starting MSRP ($41,500 vs $48,500).
| Performance | ||
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
| Top Speed | 232 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power | 265 hp | 256 hp |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Fuel Tank | 58 L | 58 L |
| Efficiency | 8.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| CO2 Emissions | 187 g/km | 206 g/km |
| Size & Capacity | ||
| Length | 4,758 mm | 4,741 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185 mm | 203 mm |
| Cargo | 340 L | 889 L |
| Curb Weight | 1,790 kg | 1,740 kg |
| Towing | 2,200 kg | 1,588 kg |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Turning Circle | 11.8 m | 11.2 m |
| Starting MSRP | $48,500 | $41,500 |